What is unclear to me about The Stranger, is whether any element of sacrifice is included at all. While Meursault is very easygoing and tends to go along with any plans his friends have, by no means is he selfless. He does things that other's tell him to simply because he has no reason not to. He doesn't help Raymond because he firmly believes in their friendship or in order to save him - he is even somewhat annoyed when Raymond calls him "pal." He helps Raymond with an attitude of "Why Not?" This attitude carries throughout the novel, coming off as apathetic and indifferent. Meursault does not sacrifice anything for anyone- evident in the fact that he is peeved by how long the journey is to his own mother's funeral. Because this novel is written in first person limited, we are restricted to only Meursault's thoughts, making it very difficult to understand the human nature of other characters in this novel such as Marie, Raymond, and Salamano.
Perhaps the absence of any sign of altruism is Camus' way of expressing that he thinks sacrifice, especially religiously speaking, is not necessary to the functioning of society. (this is also seen in the way Camus' portrays the Chaplin as over the top, narrow minded & judgmental.)
While Camus' uncovered many universal truths and exposed the judgmental aspect of human nature, he did not even address the theme of sacrifice. So, in relation to my big question, I began to wonder, can there be a world without the existence of sacrifice?
What a fascinating post, Meghan! Your comment at the end, that Camus does not address the thematic idea of sacrifice, made me wonder. In a way, Meursault willingly sacrifices himself at the end of the novel in order to preserve the truth about how he has lived his life. Do you see his intentions here as heroic or selfish?
ReplyDeleteI would say Camus did a great job leaving that up for interpretation. I can see how from one perspective his intentions would be considered heroic because he refuses to conform to societal values, but I personally thought it was selfish. It bothered me that he was always so wrapped up in his own world and his way of seeing things that he refused to look at situations from a new perspective. Towards the end it almost even seemed like he had a disregard for human life (which he rationalized with his own theories.)
ReplyDelete